In using a subheading “Rising star Dvornikov tasked to repeat Syria success in south-eastern assault” on the story about Alexander Dvornikov, Russia’s new commander, surely your editors were on autopilot, under the sway of some malign robotic influence?

For no one but a monster or the lackey of a tyrant could present anything to do with the ongoing Syrian civil war as a “success”. In the article there is talk of military superiority, an objective measure. But where did this use of “success” come from?

Henry Wessells
Upper Montclair, NJ, US

Articles You May Like

Third Point, Saddle Point win board seats at Advance Auto Parts. A plan to improve margins may unfold
Investors pull $1.5B from muni mutual funds; high-yield breaks inflow streak
Southeast Energy, University of Texas, NYC waters lead large new-issue day
Brodie Killian joins PFM Financial Advisors as director
Mortgage rates are now at the highest level of the year, and could go even higher