News

In using a subheading “Rising star Dvornikov tasked to repeat Syria success in south-eastern assault” on the story about Alexander Dvornikov, Russia’s new commander, surely your editors were on autopilot, under the sway of some malign robotic influence?

For no one but a monster or the lackey of a tyrant could present anything to do with the ongoing Syrian civil war as a “success”. In the article there is talk of military superiority, an objective measure. But where did this use of “success” come from?

Henry Wessells
Upper Montclair, NJ, US

Articles You May Like

China faces ‘fork in the road,’ IMF chief says, urging Beijing to embark on pro-market reforms
CalPERS takes stance against tax initiative
Munis steady as investors brace for mega deals, potential spread widening
Adam Neumann makes a $500 million bid for WeWork that could hit $900 million if financing and diligence firm up
Large primary slate, weaker secondary tone forces higher yields