News

In using a subheading “Rising star Dvornikov tasked to repeat Syria success in south-eastern assault” on the story about Alexander Dvornikov, Russia’s new commander, surely your editors were on autopilot, under the sway of some malign robotic influence?

For no one but a monster or the lackey of a tyrant could present anything to do with the ongoing Syrian civil war as a “success”. In the article there is talk of military superiority, an objective measure. But where did this use of “success” come from?

Henry Wessells
Upper Montclair, NJ, US

Articles You May Like

Judge permanently prohibits enforcement of Oklahoma’s anti-ESG law
Here’s why international buyers are pulling way back from the U.S. housing market
Mortgage refinance demand jumps to a 2-year high, as interest rates drop
Some renters may be ‘mortgage-ready’ and not know it. Here’s how to tell
Californians tell pollsters climate is key to bond, presidential votes